潘思京,郭章宝,邵卫,等.SSA量表与GUSS量表在急性脑卒中吞咽障碍评估中的信度和效度对比[J].中华物理医学与康复杂志,2024,46(1):23-27
扫码阅读全文
|
| SSA量表与GUSS量表在急性脑卒中吞咽障碍评估中的信度和效度对比 |
|
| |
| DOI：10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-1424.2024.01.005 |
| 中文关键词: 吞咽障碍 标准吞咽功能评估量表 GUSS吞咽功能评估量表 信度 效度 脑卒中 |
| 英文关键词: Dysphagia Swallowing Function Assessment Scale GUSS Swallowing Function Assessment Screen Reliability Validity Stroke |
| 基金项目: |
|
| 摘要点击次数: 1975 |
| 全文下载次数: 3888 |
| 中文摘要: |
| 目的 探讨并对比标准吞咽功能评估量表(SSA）、GUSS吞咽筛查量表(GUSS)在急性期脑卒中患者吞咽障碍筛查评估中的信度和效度。 方法 选取在我院住院治疗的47例急性期脑卒中患者作为研究对象，分别采用GUSS量表及SSA量表对其吞咽功能进行评估，并选用吞咽功能评估的金标准——纤维内镜下吞咽功能检查(FEES)为效标对量表筛查结果进行检验，对比SSA、GUSS量表评估急性期脑卒中患者吞咽障碍的信度和效度。 结果 GUSS量表与SSA量表的信度和效度均较好；在信度评价方面，SSA量表的重测信度、评定者间信度（重测信度ICC值=0.828，P<0.05；评定者间信度ICC值=0.909,P<0.05）更优于GUSS量表，GUSS量表的内在信度（Cronbach′s a系数=0.939）则优于SSA量表；在效度评价方面，SSA、GUSS量表的结构效度及校标效度均为良好，其中GUSS量表的敏感性（72.73%）优于SSA量表，SSA量表的特异性、约登指数、曲线下面积（分别为92.86%，0.565和0.795）则优于GUSS量表；如将SSA及GUSS量表联合用于吞咽障碍筛查，则SSA+GUSS串联诊断时的曲线下面积可达到0.767，SSA+GUSS并联诊断时的曲线下面积为0.736。 结论 SSA、GUSS量表在筛查急性期脑卒中患者吞咽障碍方面均具有良好的信度和效度，在临床实践中可考虑单独应用SSA量表或应用SSA+GUSS量表串联诊断，以提高吞咽障碍筛查的诊断效能，为预防卒中后误吸提供指导。 |
| 英文摘要: |
| Objective To compare the reliability and validity of the Standard Swallowing Function Assessment Scale (SSA) with those of the GUSS Swallowing Function Assessment Screen (GUSS) in screening for and evaluating dysphagia among stroke survivors. Methods Forty-seven stroke survivors had their swallowing function evaluated using the GUSS scale and the SSA scale. The results were compared with those of endoscopic swallowing function examinations. Results Both scales delivered good reliability and validity. The SSA scale′s test-retest reliability had an ICC value=0.828 and an inter-evaluator reliability with an ICC value=0.909. Those were better than the GUSS scale′s values, but the latter had better intrinsic reliability (Cronbach′s α=0.939). Both scales showed good structural and calibration validity, with the sensitivity of the GUSS scale (72.73%) superior to that of the SSA scale, but the GUSS scales′ specificity, Jordan index and area under the operating characteristics curve were inferior to the SSA scale′s values. Combining the two scales in dysphagia screening could produce an area under the curve of 0.77. Conclusion Both the SSA and GUSS scales have good reliability and validity in screening for swallowing disorders after a stroke. In clinical practice, the SSA alone or the two in series can improve diagnoses so as to prevent aspiration after a stroke. |
|
查看全文
查看/发表评论 下载PDF阅读器 |
| 关闭 |
